I think that pluralism of cultures is a good thing, because we construct
it in a long communitarian process and it has a reason to be. We construct a
big system of characteristic items of a specific group of people, and occidental
culture had not the authority for ignore it. The globalization process is
trying to do this, to create a unique language and unique customs.
Language is a particular item of every culture and as anthropologist we
cannot ignore it. We have to enhance it, especially in terms of
native languages with not much people who talk it. An example is Rapanui
language. Native people are keeping it alive the most is possible, but someday
they could be a smaller group of people and language could be in danger.
Kaweskar language experienced it. When the people disappeared the language
died.
That’s why I don’t agree with the man of the video and I would like to
preserve several languages. I feel comfort using my own Chilean language,
different in many things with Peruvian or Argentinian speeches. To find the
differences it the interest part of this, to recognize the difference and enjoy
it. I enjoy associating dissimilar elements like language or music with
dissimilar cultures, to know that we are different and that’s why we are so
valuable as society.
In conclusion, in the future I hope that English, Chinese or some language won’t
be common for the entire world.